The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding.
The process illustrates how different between protecting houses from flooding in where has a stopbank and without stopbank. Overall, the gap from ground level to the house floor level, which is equiped stopbank, is shorter than the other.
As can be seen from the first process, the stopbank, which is higher by freeboard (300mm) than 100-year flood level, works to prevent water overflowing from river into the internal ponding. In addition, internal runoff especially rainwater flows into internal ponding and escapes to the river through a system of floodgate and berm, which has function on draining water in one direction.
Turning to the aspect of both sides, it is clear that the height of building without stopbank have to be lifted up by a freeboard to the 100-year flood which is called ponding level. Moreover, the level of water in internal ponding is higher than where has a stopbank.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-22 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | HanaVy | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | Chaubui | 61 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | quytnee | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | TranMinhDuc | 73 | view |
- people tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves, their families and society, so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 89
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before? 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08053691275 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51438812656 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4813684651 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124416272557 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664104510377 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412171678934 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088971818747 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341314264075 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.