The table below shows the percentage of main types of dewlling in victoria, the Northern Terriory and Tasmania. Summerize the information be selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the percentage of main types of dewlling in victoria, the Northern Terriory and Tasmania. Summerize the information be selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant.

The drawing compares how people live in different types of houses in three particular states of Australia (Victoria, Northern Territory and Tasmania) between 2001 and 2006. Overall, most Australian prefer to live in houses which remained stably the highest percentage throughout the period.

As can be seen from the table, the number of people ,who choose to live in house in Tasmania, accounted the highest percentage at around 89 percent over 6 years of the period that were higher than in The Northern Territory by approximately a quarter (65 percent and 63 percent, respectively). Moreover, the choices of semi-attached house was the most common in the Northern Territory at about 14 percent during the period; conversely, the opposite was true in Tasmania which just reported at 3 percent in 2001 and 4 percent in 2006.

Turning to the data of people who lived in flat/apartment, there was a similar trend at approximately 9 percent throughout the recorded period between Victoria and Territory. Meanwhile, some people enjoyed to live in other types which was described at 14 and 11 percent, respectively, from the first year to the last year of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-13 khoa242 73 view
Essays by user khoa242 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...een from the table, the number of people ,who choose to live in house in Tasmania,...
^^
Line 8, column 199, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoyed living'.
Suggestion: enjoyed living
...a and Territory. Meanwhile, some people enjoyed to live in other types which was described at 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14136125654 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91266101696 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5786080501 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.666666667 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0861824226887 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050433878996 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295679516785 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658403312891 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272926010159 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.