Social media has completely changed the way family and friends communicate with each other. What are the other reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development?
The communication approach of families and friends with each other has been altered by social media. There is a strong likelihood that effective communication is the main reason for such an alternation, and it might bring positive implications in terms of a strong bond.
Admittedly, people tend to use social networking sites for having effective communication with their relatives or friends. Such applications may reduce distortion such as misunderstanding that most of the time happens when people used traditional methods such as telegram or pager as a result of minimalizing expression and text characters, and by using video call as one functionality of such applications, such a drawback might be overcome. Facebook, as an example of famous social networking sites, has been launched a video call feature and by accessing such a feature, users can see and speak directly to their families or friends. This resulted in less miscommunication between individuals to other individuals.
What is more, such an improvement in the way of communication leads to a person having tightened relationship with parents and friends. The usage of such applications too much may trigger users to avoid direct communication which is the best communication way. Nevertheless, in terms of effective communication, it will be the easiest way to keep in touch when such people have a long distance. The majority of students who pursue their higher education abroad uses Skype application to make a video call, and this helps them for keeping communicating with their relatives. This is ample evidence such applications bringing positive implications for tightening relationship.
In conclusion, the communication method has been changed by social media accessed due to the effectiveness of communication, and such applications may help them to maintain their relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-20 | tabe_success | 91 | view |
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 84
- The number of French adults who parents spoke a regional language of French to them when they were children and the number who speak a French regional language to their own children 79
- Social media has completely changed the way family and friends communicate with each other What are the other reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'keeping communicating'.
Suggestion: keeping communicating
...e a video call, and this helps them for keeping to communicate with their relatives. This is ample evi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49305555556 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40818023517 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2873468906 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261708866 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119273843729 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096233463116 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178691243477 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867383302955 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.