Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals, during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this opinion?
Some people think that traditional festivals have no longer remember the original meaning. While I accept that festivals periods seem to be an event for enjoyment, I disagree that people have forgotten the meaning of religious festivals.
On the one hand, religious and traditional festivals have certainly become times for celebration. In the globalization and boom economic, people are likely to spend most of time on work that is a cause of anxiety and stress. As a result, they are most concerned with shopping, decorating their homes and enjoying traditional meals, which is to relax. For example, in Viet Nam, most people look forward to Lunar new year as a holiday rather than a time to practice religion families.
On the other hand, the meaning of festivals is still remembered and conveyed to the next generation. It is undeniable that families play an important role in passing knowledge of traditional festivals on to their offspring. For instance, almost Vietnamese children have learned by their parents how to make rice cakes that are one of the most famous Vietnamese traditional foods. In addition, lessons about why traditional cultures and festival are established are imparted to students in school. In that way, they can deeply knowledge about historical background behind these occasions so as to reinforce patriotic. For example, in Hung King festivals of Viet Nam, school students might perform a play that depicts how this country was built to remember and thank to the huge effort of previous ancestors.
In conclusion, despite people want to enjoy themselves during religious festivals, they still have not forgotten the meaning of them
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-24 | zoeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee | 61 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can the government do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rical background behind these occasions so as to reinforce patriotic. For example, in Hu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23507462687 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82744984035 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1798266205 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325274434783 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113084125274 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853885697761 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229368521655 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846127817735 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.