Torreya taxifolia

Essay topics:

Torreya taxifolia

The reading and the lecture both discuss about ways that can save Torreya taxifolia from exctinction, but they have contradicting views on the issue. While reading suggests that here are three ways that might save Torreya taxifolia, the lecture explains why they will not work.

First, the reading states that the first option is to help the tree grow where it used to for thousands of years, in Florida to be exact, because of the microclimate that exists in that part. The lecture, on the other hand, refutes this idea by claiming that the microclimate will in fact be affected by the overall climate of that region. It further adds on to say that the cool, damp weather cannot be maintained due to the influence from the dry, warm climate around the region. Therefore, the tree will not be able to survive.

Second, another point that the reading makes is to move it far away from Florida because its seeds might grow in some forests further north where climate is more applicable. The lecture, on the contrary, refutes this idea by saying that the existing plants in that new location might destroy completely Torreya. Moreover, it explains by giving an example of another tree Black Boakes and how it destroyed other plants because of its ability to proliferate very fast.

Third, the reading suggests another option that might work; to preserve Torreya in researching centers. The lecture expresses disbelief by stating that the number of trees that can be reserved is not big enough. Additionally, it provides that a small number of the trees can make them a target to different diseases and viruses.

Overall, the issue whether there is a way to stop Torreya taxifolia from going extinct is open to debate

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-25 Apolytos 80 view
2023-08-23 Yash Mehta 75 view
2023-07-01 theprasad 60 view
2023-04-22 fmichela 90 view
2023-02-25 Muggle 3 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user hasan123456 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture both discuss...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... enough. Additionally, it provides that a small number of the trees can make them a target to dif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, while, in fact, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8976109215 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44819116815 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.890191226 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20641527976 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810669516368 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112991702692 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145152864653 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132284658313 0.0443174109184 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.