TPO 41 integrated writing
The article diccisses using new regulations for potecting environment from chemicals. But the text thinks these regulations are not required and might have negative consequenses. text provides three reasons. The lecture rejects the text's reasons and state these rules are essential and supports that with three reasons.
first, the professor states that pouring waste of companies into ponds must be banned. These hazardouse chemicals that enter into facial waters cause a lot of damae to invironment. for example these chemicals leak to grounds. Because of these bad censequences, a restrict rule is need.
second, the lecture states that existing confirm rules for handling is essential. Also, companies must be responsible about the cycling their waste materials. For example, mercury is a very dangerous material. The text claims that cycling causes using of these materials decreases, but in reality when mercury recycles the amount of consumption of this material does not decreas.
third, the text states that the cost will decrease. howeve, the professor avers that these increase is just one percent. one percent for having a clean environment is not that much. So, the professor explains that it worth it to spending money for having clean atmosphere.
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task 66
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 70
- TOEFL TPO 07- Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO 42 independent writing 3
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Text
...d and might have negative consequenses. text provides three reasons. The lecture rej...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... and supports that with three reasons. first, the professor states that pouring wast...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...rs cause a lot of damae to invironment. for example these chemicals leak to grounds...
^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nds. Because of these bad censequences, a restrict rule is need. second, the lecture stat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...censequences, a restrict rule is need. second, the lecture states that existing confi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...ion of this material does not decreas. third, the text states that the cost will dec...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Howeve
...ext states that the cost will decrease. howeve, the professor avers that these increas...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...hat these increase is just one percent. one percent for having a clean environment ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43147208122 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66477640065 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609137055838 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6360529104 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.875 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.3125 21.698381199 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199968952763 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690498338488 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435628013215 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118819672821 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315036681395 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.