The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.
The bar graph demonstrates consumers’ spending in United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Japan in 2009 on five major categories, namely food, housing, transportation, health care and clothing.
As can be inferred from the bar chart, the shares of expenditures for food products, real estate and commuting registered the highest figures out of five sectors examined. It is clear that health and clothing-related categories held the market shares by a very small margin.
In the UK and Japan, minimum spending of residents on food was one-fifth of the total expenditures, while Americans and Canadians only spent less than 15% on this category. An relatively opposite patterns were seen in the transportation expenditure shares, where Canada and the US registered the highest and second-highest figures at 20% and 17% respectively, compared to 15% in the UK and only 10% in Japan. Comparatively, residents’ expenditure on arranging accommodation in all four countries was rather uniform. In particular, the highest amount of money spent on housing was recorded for the US, at 26% of the total expenditure, followed by the rest of examined countries accounting for well above 20%.
In the year of 2009, it can be seen that the US spent the largest amount of money for health care among other nations, comprising 7% of the total spending. Meanwhile, residents of Canada and Japan made a 4 percent spend on health care, and British's’ medical expenses were negligible with the data stood at just 1%. Such discrepancies were not seen in clothing expenditure shares, where the nationalities managed their budget for clothes in the vicinity of 5%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-19 | tranthaolinh27052002 | 73 | view |
2019-08-23 | Cherry06 | 67 | view |
2019-08-22 | phanduydat | 78 | view |
2019-08-18 | lnmt2007 | 73 | view |
2019-07-22 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 91 | view |
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 84
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- It is important to children to learn the difference between right and wrong at the early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...y spent less than 15% on this category. An relatively opposite patterns were seen ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, well, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22906727389 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.225122629 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281445588025 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987163423086 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986515050916 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185714280036 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11365333024 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.