The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table uses the percentage as an indicator to show the amount spent on three categories by five nations(Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey) in 2002.
To begin, all five countries had spent mostly on food/drinks/tobacco. Clothing/footwear had been their second priority, followed by leisure/ education. A significant drop from food/drinks/tobacco to clothing/footwear and recreation/education is evident from the table in all the countries.
Turkey had been the top-most user of food/drinks/tobacco(32.14%) and leisure/education. And, it had been the second largest consumer of clothing/footwear. Italy had beaten Turkey by accounting 9% of human wearables purchase. In contrast to Turks, who spent most of their money on two products, Swedish people had spent low on two products: food/drinks/tobacco(15.77%), wearables(5.4%), when compared to others countries.
Ireland, Sweden, and Turkey had never topped the list. But, Turkey and Italy had been in first place twice and once respectively showing their people's interest in these categories. Majorly, unlike the other four countries, Turks had put almost half the nations purchase on those three categories alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-21 | Lakshmi Prasanna jagarlamudi | 73 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 76
- The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 11
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internetaccess), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping intouch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situ 23
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.30734867351 2.65546596893 162% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5306319291 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0562189040759 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260581777771 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391059658286 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0463279941852 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425556318463 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.64 11.4140731707 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.