Some people believe law changes human behaviour. Do you agree/disagree?
Recently the phenomenons of the change in law and its corresponding impacts on human behaviour have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex laws are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that change in law can be a plus and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, modern life can offer the society some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues and final outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that human behaviour is directly impacted by any changes to the law and current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, law changes might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the change in law far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- World is becoming forest of buildings and it is becoming difficult to find trees everywhere. Eradicate Global Warming. 11
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?OrExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
- Some people believe laws change human behaviour. Do you agree with it? 85
- Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books. Agree or disagree? 55
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65610859729 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18008457443 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701357466063 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.344995222 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.636363636 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0554956265149 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.018285173722 0.0925447433944 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0202007977377 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032799934767 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154900636298 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.