Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?

In today's advancing world every aspect of life can be best explained with a practical example.
In my opinion, it is always beneficial to learn any topic with practical experience.
It helps a person understand the subject in a better and elaborate way.

Not every subject can be learnt with experience. It is equally necessary to have thorough theoretical knowledge about the topic in order to understand the shortfall and advantage of it. memorizing everything is a difficult task. When it comes to retaining the details of any theory the practical knowledge supersedes knowledge which is acquired by the books. It is rightly said that books are our best friends. The knowledge gained with a book remains with us forever. However, learning in modern society has become easy and fun with the latest technology like camera, projectors, experiments live sessions activities, excursions and many more. These techniques help to create interest and curiosity among students which in turn enables them to remember topic easily.
With the advancement in science and technology, experiencing and correlating the topic with our day to day life has made learning more interesting and enthusiastic. Learning with experience requires very less effort as compared to learning through books. Undoubtedly, learning cannot be accomplished without book nor it can be well executed without practical experience. In conclusion, I would say that though books are key to understand the theory but to have in-depth knowledge and a better understanding of learning through live experiments is a necessity.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... subject in a better and elaborate way. Not every subject can be learnt with exp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...orizing everything is a difficult task. When it comes to retaining the details of an...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39357429719 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01954622296 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574297188755 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8994069194 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5333333333 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0956522857175 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033192417512 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382316462611 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521607841549 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428763265754 0.0609392437508 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.