Academic staff percentages in faculties, by gender, 2012.
The figure elucidate the percentages of academic staff in faculties by gender in 2012. At first glance, it is evident that the male staffs are higher than female workers in four different sectors.
To begin with, Male staffs are dramatically higher than women workers in Engineering, which constituted 3 times higher than the total number of women staffs. Moreover, Law, Science and Business additionally have the same pattern in which male staffs, which was approximately at three-fifths, just above 60%, and just over six in ten respectively, are higher than females, which made up at four in ten in Law, just below two-fifths in Science and Business.
Nevertheless, Female workers have an enormous number in Arts, Education and Medicine instead of males. The number of females worker is three times higher than men staffs in Education. Furthermore, It is also been the case for arts, in which females are higher roughly around 15% higher than men. Nevertheless, there was a small difference in the number of worker in medicine in between men and women, which was roughly at well beyond four in ten.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-11 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | Angina | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | Angina | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | samandarkumar | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-18 | deepak krishnamurthy | 61 | view |
- The graph above shows the radio and television audience throughout the day in 1982. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The diagrams below illustrate changes affected in the district park between 2004 and 2014 59
- The graph below shows the purchasing of petrol by people from the United States and United Kingdom according to their salaries. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'elucidates'.
Suggestion: elucidates
The figure elucidate the percentages of academic staff in fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05464480874 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75202671673 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8615973083 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1135692895 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934122519277 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18328280009 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137761183221 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164458908804 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.