The table shows the number of teaching schools in 2000, 2005 and 2009.
The table elucidates the percentage of various teaching schools from 2000 through to 2009. At first glance, it is evident that community schools faced a dramatic upsurge in comparing to other educational institutions.
To begin with, the most noticeable changes among other centre of learning are voluntary-controlled schools and community schools. At first, voluntary-controlled schools stood at 52% in 2000 and erratically, it decreased tremendously over the following 9 years to finish at two-tenths. In contrast, 2000 to 2009 witnessed highly progress in which it upright positioned at 12% in 2000 and achieved at 58 in 100.
In regard to other two schools, there was a moderate drop in the percentage of enrolling student in specialist school between 2000, which was at 12%, and 2009, which made up at one-tenths. Furthermore, grammar schools have the same pattern as specialist school over the following 5 years, nevertheless, it plunged significantly in the next 4 years to end at 12%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 73
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 67
- The bar chart shows the computer ownership by education level, 2002 & 2010. 78
- Line graph Income of four restaurants January to December 79
- Essay topics: Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, in contrast, in regard to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32278481013 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43040894004 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8445741598 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22780465931 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129131270945 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111069455884 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183085677328 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696779273911 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.