Some people believe that residents are responsible for the place where they live to be clean and tidy. Others believe that the government is responsible. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The world is facing numerous pressing issues nowadays with the increase in population. One such biggest concern is cleanliness and hygiene of our surroundings. But the questions is who should be accountable for bringing this change? Government authorities or local citizens. I strongly believe that it should be a combined effort of both administrative bodies and the local residents. This essay will analyze this viewpoint with suitable examples and suggest how the coordination of both can make a big difference.
The government of any nation has the power to pass new laws and to improve the economy of the country. This power of the administration can be used to spread awareness about sanitation and launch schemes at a national level. It has been seen that in many backward countries, rural areas suffer from hygiene. Therefore, it is the legal duty of the government to spread awareness among people and let them know how the uncleanliness in their neighborhood affects their physical health. In addition to this, sufficient funds are also required by the government to pay for the services such as garbage collection offered by municipal workers. For instance, the government of India has launched the 'Swachh Bharat' mission in India at a national level in 2014 with an aim to achieve open defecation free states and reduce the use of plastic. Ministry of India has also provided considerable funds for the success of this movement. From a purely financial perspective and raising awareness, the involvement of government is necessary.
At the same time efforts of administration would be in vain If people would not support them and act with a sense of responsibility. People should at least spare few minutes from their daily regime to devote themselves in the cleanliness of not their household but also their neighborhood. It is the sole duty of every citizen to throw litter in garbage bins, to keep their roads clean, to avoid the usage of plastic bags and abide by the government laws. Parents and teachers should teach children these moral values as part of education. These minute efforts by everyone pave the way to clean place to live for them and future generations as well.
By hammering the final nail, I pen down by saying that living in a clean and beautiful place is a dream of everyone and this can be seen alive by the joined hands of government and local people.
- Write a letter to a city planning manager about the demolition of a historical building in your area In your letter you should explain why it shouldn t be demolished suggest a future use for this building recommend a way to raise money for repairs 65
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. Why is this? Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter: • thank your friend for the holiday • explain that you left your wallet in their house 87
- Some people say that no one should be allowed to work after the age of 65.Others say that people should be allowed to work for as long as they want. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your a 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... how the coordination of both can make a big difference. The government of any...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9776119403 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84484576855 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1478350571 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.05 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163699814098 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461032148024 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396382134525 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101936894627 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136773163823 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.