Some say that people working in different job roles should get different amounts of holiday time. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience.
Today by industrializing societies a wide spectrum of works are created which some of them have fundamental difference in their entity, namely physical or mental work. Some person are of the opinion that leisure time should be distinguished between different jobs. I go along with the notion, but up to a certain point, which I will discuss it succinctly .
To begin with, there is no dubious that consuming energy and amount of concentration are different for each employment. Whenever pressure of working milieu, workload and working long hours grow, the number of erroneous mistakes, which leads to decline employees’ productivity, scale up. Therefore, it is better that an augmenting in their leisure time be considered by employers, leading to cut staff’s stress. Moreover, it might said that if workers are less stressed and fitter, their level of output and service will be more higher, leading to more efficient of working time. Finally, increasing holiday time in full stress works may directly affect more effectiveness at work.
On the other hand, differentiating in leisure and pastime time between workers might be deemed as a discrimination. There are supplementary and motivating ways to be substituted with holiday time instead of increasing that. One of them is leisure-base payment such as pay increment, perk, or financial rewards, namely bounce and incentive. It might also be said that, if this budget was spent on (for instance) making more quality time during holiday, the employees would achieve better career progression.
Overall, it seems that, while some works sound having to have more holiday time, and meager of these kind of days have substantial drawbacks on their throughput, employers can cut down on these days and replace them with some monetary-related issues.
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 84
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 73
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not e ective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...oint, which I will discuss it succinctly . To begin with, there is no dubious t...
^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...eir level of output and service will be more higher, leading to more efficient of working t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... time in full stress works may directly affect more effectiveness at work. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...o have more holiday time, and meager of these kind of days have substantial drawbacks on t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35314685315 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02634853667 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622377622378 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7985511008 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164977452308 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640903930622 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544682288545 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104741463805 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453533101696 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.