the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of usa residents who eat fast food during the year 2003 to 2013.
it can be clearly seen that the hobby of eating was being healthy. Overall, the difference between eating every day and never is high in the year 2003.
In 2003, the percentage of buying fast food every day is lowest at under 5%, the second low is never at 5%. Compared with these two options, we can observe that the frequency of usa inhabitants was declined slightly, dropped to 3% and 4% respectively. The specialist was that the percentage between 2006 to 2013 in these two choices remain unchanged.
For several times a week and one a week, the trends were similar, from 17% and 31%, rose to 20% and 33% steadily at 2006, and then declined to 16% and 27% dramatically in the year 2013. Moreover, the change of once or twice a month was opposite with the behind options, decreased by 5% softly from 30% in 2003 to 25%, and finally increased rapidly to 33%. About a few times a year, which was raised lightly from 12% to 15% in 2006, and it remains unchanged until 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-21 | Dhruvil | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | doubletee | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | cocococo123 | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...st food during the year 2003 to 2013. it can be clearly seen that the hobby of e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47474747475 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42346367963 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9617753836 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955602241919 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451662735128 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051266971054 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075646193586 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567020713666 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.