TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task
Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she looked like. For a long time, the only accepted image of Austen was an amateur sketch of an adult Austen made by her sister Cassandra. However recently a professionally painted, full-length portrait of a teenage girl owned by a member of the Austen family has come up for sale. Although the professional painting is not titled Jane Austen, there are good reasons to believe she is the subject.
First, in 1882, several decades after Austen's death, Austen's family gave permission to use the portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letters. Austen's family clearly recognized it as a portrait of the author. So, for over a century now, the Austen family itself has endorsed the claim that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen.
Second, the face in the portrait clearly resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch, which we know depicts Austen. Though somewhat amateurish, the sketch communicates definite details about Austen's face. Even though the Cassandra sketch is of an adult Jane Austen, the features are still similar to those of the teenage girl in the painting. The eyebrows, nose, mouth, and overall shape of the face are very much like those in the full-length portrait.
Third, although the painting is unsigned and undated, there is evidence that it was painted when Austen was a teenager. The style links it to Ozias Humphrey, a society portrait painter who was the kind of professional the wealthy Austen family would hire. Humphrey was active in the late 1780s and early 1790s, exactly the period when Jane Austen was the age of the girl in the painting.
The reading and lecture are both about a portrait that seems to belong to teenage Jane Austen. The article states that this portrait belong to young austen and provide thee reosons of support. however, the professor explains that the evidence not at all convincing that the portrait linking to her and refutes each of the author reasons.
The article mentions that Austen's family recognize the girl in portrait as teenage Jane Austen. The professor refutes this point. he states that the portrait was shown to the public 70 years after her death. So none of the relevant that recognizes that as Austen's portrait sow her by themselves.
The article claims that the portrait is like the only sketch of janes' face even in details like eyebrows, nose and etc. however, the lecture contends that at that time Jane Austen had a lot of cousin in that age and he believes the portrait belongs to one of her distant relatives.
Moreover, it is stated in the article that there is some evidence of the painter that was active in the period when she was a teenager. The lecture opposes this point. there is a stamp on the back of the convas that suggested that the portrait was painted 27 years after Jane Austen birth and it can't belong to teenage Austen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Mostafa93106325 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mostafa93106325 | 76 | view |
- TPO 19 integrated essayMany consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people they 73
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 70
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing TaskJane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she loo 61
- TPO 11: a decline in reading the literature 73
- The text is discussing salvage logging which defines it as a way we aim to deal with dead trees and remove them and provides three reasons of support. The professor goes against all of the explained reasons and tells us why she is against the text. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...en and provide thee reosons of support. however, the professor explains that the eviden...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...sten. The professor refutes this point. he states that the portrait was shown to p...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ace even in details like eyebrows, nose and etc. however, the lecture contends that at t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...enager. The lecture opposes this point. there is a stamp on the back of the convas th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...27 years after jane austen birth and it cant belong to teenage austen.
^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...27 years after jane austen birth and it cant belong to teenage austen.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74193548387 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22748979862 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6895427461 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.75 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 7.06452816374 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475522711353 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18274722033 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125403547585 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320962581317 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552122461183 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.