Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are opposing views regarding whether the government budget should spent for art and culture or cultural events should be supported. In my opinion, while the former is true for underdeveloped countries, the latter is more appropriate for developed ones.
In countries where there is a growing disparity between rich and poor, I understand why people are bashing the idea of funding for art. The labor workers are the population who cannot meet their basic needs such as food or accommodation. This is why, to them, art is the embodiment of the rich. Countries like India and China are good examples, while government financial assistance is spent on investing in art, there are millions of people who are malnourished due to deprivation of food. Therefore, investment by the government in art and culture can lead to tension and conflicts and accordingly pose a serious threat to the safety and stability of the society.
As for developed countries, if the government support activities which convey cultural expressions, there will be more advantages for their economies as a whole. These projects will lay the solid foundation for the development of tourism, which is a labor-intensive industry. By doing this, it could create more job opportunities for residents and generate an enormous source of income for the local region. As a result, it will boost national economic growth. A case in point is that Japan, with its cultural richness, attracts massive influx of tourists from different parts of the world every year and thus encouraging its tourism industry in an impressive way.
In conclusion, while there are some drawbacks when there is a supply for art and culture in underdeveloped nations, an investing in cultural projects will boost the overall economy of developed ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Vo Phan Minh Hieu | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | tominhduc | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | tominhduc | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Vo Phan Minh Hieu | 78 | view |
- It is better for people to be unemployed than to be employed but they do not enjoy. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many young people change their jobs and careers. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 11
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an impressive way" with adverb for "impressive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d thus encouraging its tourism industry in an impressive way. In conclusion, while there are some d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17869415808 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95751537254 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6322202124 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284276020241 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945996719544 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764820704079 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174606900303 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585042407953 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.