The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed.
Given is the pie chart illustrating the proportion of various features that 4000 attendants in a survey have appreciated most from their apprenticeship experience.
An initial impression is that practical knowledge, communication skills are among the most important perspectives that those candidates have accumulated.
Getting back to detail, 15% of candidates assumed that hands-on knowledge is the most crucial lessons they have been trained, which is followed closely by the figure for communication skills, exactly at 14%. Half of that, the experiences in real-work, skills of how to manage time, operate work and future plan for the occupational path are picked by 7% trainees as their most valuable knowledge from their training activity.
Standing at one tenth, industry understanding ranks at the third position in what those apprentices have learned in comparison with insignificant statistics of the knowledge about working environment and teamwork aspects, with 4% and 3%, respectively. Interestingly, there is a considerably large slide for unspecified criteria, occupying just over a quarter.
- Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in thecity.Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city ) andsuggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed. 84
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 11
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work andcommunicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...knowledge from their training activity. Standing at one tenth, industry understa...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teria, occupying just over a quarter.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81707317073 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28911278899 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701219512195 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3145502638 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.0 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157758752775 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707131762288 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481139020894 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937648822072 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297899946031 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 61.2550243902 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.06136585366 131% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.