The two line graph show the trends in six popular male and female names in the UK between 1925 and 2000.
Overall, apart from Daniel, both girls' and boys' names generally became popularity after 1975. However, the boys' names had the more popularity than the girls' name during the period given.
For the figures of the boys' name, Daniel has been most consistently popular name that started with nearly 4 per thousand in 1925. This name's figure consistently continued to increase over 50 years, and it reached the highest number at 12 per thousand in 1975. On the other hand, Alexander has been the least popular, even it stayed below 2 per thousand until 1975. However, after the this point, it experienced a sharp and gradually increase and hit the peak trend in 2000. Furthermore, Oliver had the most fluctuation, and it was not the preferred name in 1975. However, this figure climbed up to nearly 11 per thousand in the last period given.
Compared with boys', the girls' names had the less popular and more stable from 1925 to 2000. Both Sophia and Isabella were not almost using until 1975, but they swiftly uptrend at nearly 12 and 9 respectively in 2000. Moreover, Emily was more popular than other girls' names, and it was also below 2 until 1975. Then it rapidly increased and reached the peak figure at 11 per thousand in 2000.
- The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010 73
- The diagram below shows the structure of a basic rocket engine 56
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this trend? 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The world would be a happier place if we all enjoyed our work To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t from Daniel, both girls and boys names generally became popularity after 1975. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 381, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...per thousand until 1975. However, after the this point, it experienced a sharp and gradu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...12 and 9 respectively in 2000. Moreover, Emily was more popular than other girls ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72340425532 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28262871343 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.0121994911 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.3846153846 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206237000535 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862883907871 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721626291968 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153014310158 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450715923619 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.