A controversial debate which is raised about the role of modern transportation in our lives. Some people hold the view that modern transportation encourages people to own more cars and increase traffic on the roads. However, some others may have an opposing view and feel that modern technology helps to create a cleaner environment. From my vantage view, I concur with the later groups and feel that tools are available to use non-fuel vehicles which preserves the environment and save fuel money.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that modern technology enables us to save the environment. Many electrical cars are available in the market which does not need fuel to operate. These vehicles do not release carbon dioxide into the air. Thus, they do not harm the environment. A vivid example which shed light on what was elaborated above is the creation of Tesla car. Those cars are called zero emission cars, which means that they do not release carbon dioxide and causes the green gas effect. They are environment-friendly cars that keep the air clean.
The second point which is worth some words here is that because of no fuel consumption, these cars can save us money. A car can be plugged into electricity the whole night and be ready to drive the next day. Saving fuel cost can save us lots of money. For instance, a regular car needs to be filled with 4 gallons of fuel to cross 200 miles. The four gallons cost around $20. However, with electricity operated vehicles, we can save this money and at the same time save the environment.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. There is another subtle point to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study published in the Amecian car magazine Journal. The study shows that governments are significantly encouraging people to own these cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allows people to save money, and the pool lane driving path which allows people to save time in the roads.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes the importance of this technology. It helps to creat a cleaner environment. In addition to the save in money and time for the owners.
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than their friends. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 73
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 80
- Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss the danger of glass on birds. While the reading state that there are many solutions to prevent injuries to birds. The lecture refutes this, by saying that these solutions not effective to prevent birds fro 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can save us lots of money. For instance, a regular car needs to be filled with 4 ...
^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... own these cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allo...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...save in money and time for the owners.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87755102041 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79252270335 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1136668549 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.48 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.68 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0406267300013 0.236089414692 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0132624057105 0.076458572812 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329631490467 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0252357913877 0.150856017488 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422006375683 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.