The chart illustrates how many percents of British people by age range give money to charity between 1990 and 2010.
In the first glance, it was noticeable that in 1990, the highest percentage group people who donate money to charity was 36-50, which was over 40%. The youngster in the age of 18-25 had the least percentage, which was only approximately 17%. However, there was over 30% of the age range from 26-35, 51-65 and those who were over 65 had made a donation to the charity.
As the chart demonstrates, in 2010, people who were aged 51-65 had given more money to charity, which increased by 4%. Donation from the group age of 36-50 had decreased, while people who were over 65 had increased, and met the same percentage, which was 35%. Not to mention, young people not only remained the least, and still had dipped 11% over the 20-year period.
To sum up, it was evident that old ages were willing to donate than those young ones.
- Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children suffer because they do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past.Do you agree or disagree? 91
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people using various form of transport in France 61
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The table compares mobile phone 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...had dipped 11% over the 20-year period. To sum up, it was evident that old ages ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, still, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62130177515 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29460711364 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.9796771746 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170648032694 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970509122757 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105866337919 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143806360839 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128799288974 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.