Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads
It is such a remarkable tendency that the number of countries owing railway systems had grown. While some people argue that it is high time that Government paid more attentions to railways instead of roads, from my view, do I both concur and dispute with this statement due to following reasons.
On the one hand, there are several benefits that railway lines should be invested rather than roads. First and for most, it is believed to be one of the most effective methods of transportation in the future for city dwellers. Not only saving time but residents also gain little money since buying ticket is more inexpensive than owing a private vehicle. Furthermore, moving from one place to another by trains is safer and quite quicker than by car or motorbike. Secondly, the more cutting-edge railways systems are namely subway and high-speed train, the less contaminated the air pollution is. Whereas preventing the environment from fumes has been of increasing concern, should individual means of transportation are minimized, CO2 will be eliminated dramatically that leads to the savage of public purse.
On the other hand, I disagree with this opinion due to the number of drawbacks. To begin with, it is such a long-lasting plan that the Government should take many factors into consideration namely geography, modern technologies, labour forces and burden as well. Providing that the combination of these conditions is less efficient, either train or road transport will have the bad quality. However, instead of spending a huge amount of money developing railway system, enhancing current types of transport especially road is believed to be better. Next, the increasing in number of railways leads to many extra requirements. For example, apart from setting up both stations and automatic ticket machines, tracks are necessary to be checked and improved frequently that consumes a numerous of public burden. Moreover, how to encourage local residents to travel by trains has been also complicated because they feel it uncomfortable to exchange many trains during a whole long trip.
In conclusion, whether train is preferred to be manufactured to other forms of transport or not that depends on how a country's situations and what the Government's policies are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Ngô Quốc Thắng | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 11
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The chart below give information about the high speed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 91
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23835616438 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90091579357 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594520547945 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8941653903 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265824228961 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720623647344 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679185176465 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129918872227 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595230675285 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.