Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones in school. To what extent do yoy agree or disagree ?
Young adults must be refrained or prohibited from using cellular phones in school especially during the school hours. This essay quite agrees with this statement because it causes distraction and unhealthy competition between them.
The usage of mobile phones in school can cause lack of focus. Firstly,this can lead to loss of concentration during a lecture, as some students can get engrossed with social media and practically forget they are in class to study. The main objective of being in school is to learn and become successful cum self-reliant adult in future. Any mobile technological device that is capable of luring them away from their studies must be banned.
Secondly, another important factor is competition for latest phones which may lead to peer pressure and invariably bullying. For example, many could be pressurized into taking drastic measures such as stealing or even taken to prostitution, to acquire a mobile telephone device at all cost because not all parents can afford to buy phones for their wards, let alone a sophisticated one. Also, many student may be regarded as an object of ridicule to their friends as they could not fit into their group. This may have a devastating effect on them and may prevent them from getting a good grade in school or may in some worst cases result in them totally abandoning their education. Teenagers are in their formative years, and nothing must be allowed to come in their way of acquiring quality education as they are the future generation.
To conclude, this essay opine that teens should be banned from using cellular phones in school because it prevents them from focusing on their studies and lead to fatal rivalry for latest phones among them. These two points are some of the major reasons why some students get discouraged from learning because of peer pressure and its associated problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-22 | samuel gill | 78 | view |
- Contrasting views about which problem is more predominant in cities. 73
- A friend you met while studying abroad requested you inform her about job opportunities in your country and you found a suitable one for her. 89
- Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones in school To what extent do yoy agree or disagree 74
- Arguments about whether University students should be allowed to select their courses or not. 73
- Your local council is considering closing a sport and leisure centre that it runs in order to save money. Write a letter to the local council. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
... school can cause lack of focus. Firstly,this can lead to loss of concentration durin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ecome successful cum self-reliant adult in future. Any mobile technological device that i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...phones among them. These two points are some of the major reasons why some students get dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05483870968 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61935682504 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.870008537 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192761474094 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761560789214 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629002780193 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129153737961 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238252021598 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.