Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour.(opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the past, it takes long hours to complete a task through physical exploitation, whereas the same work takes shorter time frame nowadays, largely due to the technology growth and automatic machines. For this reason, it is argued by people that the duration of work should be cut down. Absolutely, I agree with this ideology because of the following reasons.
To begin with, the speed rate at which chores are accomplished is astonishingly high. The computerized machines execute duties twice as fast as humans. If information is correctly input, and the instructions are intact, there would not be any unnecessary delays. For instance, while a man would take some minutes to process a mathematical equation, a Central Processing Unit will do same in millisecond. This means that the higher the technology the lower the time and labour needed
Another point is from the multitask ability angle. Autonomous engines, if well programmed, could perform multiple tasks that are meant for a number of individuals. By doing this, the amount of manual labour that is required will reduce, therefore the jobs will be done within a specific duration. For instance, a crushing machine in a mining factory can load, crush and unload products without hassle. Obviously, there is no need for manual labour which, undoubtedly, will waste time. Since this has been removed, it will be more easier to execute
As can be seen, high-level engines which were birthed by advanced technology enable speed and multitask, and as a result, the delegated tasks are completed swiftly. On the basis of this, the working hour should be reduced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-28 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
- Some businesses observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to lack interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues. What could be the reason for this? What solutions can help address this problem? 78
- 2. Your friend is moving to your neighbourhood next weekend.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter- offer to help your friend move- Explain when and how you can help- give them some useful information about the local area 73
- Boxing is a wild sport. It should not be in existenceTo what extent do you agree? 73
- A company has contacted the local council to build their company in the community. Write a letter to the council and in your letter,Write why it is a bad idea to allow them build their company in the community. Suggest another location for the company to 78
- Shopping is now a common leisure activity for youths in many countriesWhy is this the caseIs this a positive development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 526, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...Since this has been removed, it will be more easier to execute As can be seen, high-le...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15849056604 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76216104561 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645283018868 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5106762918 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232568681177 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780913999421 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686563009317 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139674737235 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348815009818 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.