The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001
The bar charts provide a source of information relating to how households owning cars had exchanged during 30 years in a particular country in Europe.
It is obvious that whereas the number of families who did not possess any cars went down, those who owned more than one car had fluctuated and improved finally. Especially, buying one car was likely to be the most favorable demand until 2001.
Looking in the charts for more details, in 1971, besides nearly 47% of a whole European household without a car, 35% of those gained one car which was twice time as much as the proportion of two or more cars. Between 1971 and 1981, the figure of families having either one car or not reduced slightly by approximately 5%. However, European residents had a tendency to own at least 2 cars.
Next 20 years, the percentage of no car owning had continuously diminished until below 30%. On the other hand, in spite of the highest ratio of one car city dwellers had in 1991, this figure eliminated inconsiderably which seemed 43%. Moreover, apart from an insignificant drop, the proportion of 2 or more cars in a European country had been maintained in parallel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | naalasadan | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | nazgu | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 89
- The plan below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, apart from, at least, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78109452736 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71021470203 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646766169154 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8695799883 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1111111111 5.23603664747 250% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286062872344 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115174726789 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419540866697 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16149641652 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451763931718 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.