Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think that they should be banned.Do you agree or disagree?

One of the causes of land and sea pollution are shopping bags which made out of plastic. I completely agree that they should be banned as it is not only harmful to animals but also is a major factor contributing to the increase of wastes produced per year.

Firstly, plastic is a non-biodegradable component which means it takes around one fifty to two hundred years to decompose. As it is excessively used in day-to-day life for shopping, purchasing of vegetables, etc, a huge amount of waste's dump is generated every day and this leads to piles of dumps every year. This dump is either thrown into dumping yards or oceans where it remains for a long time polluting the environment or it keeps floating in the water bodies and disturbs the marine life. It also occupies a considerably larger land area which could be utilized for better purposes. Thus, plastic bags should be banned to reduce the amount of waste produced.

Another point to consider is that these plastic bags are a major threat to animals. Land animals such as cows, buffalos, dogs consume these bags and die when these bags remain undigested in their stomach for a longer time. There has been an increase in the number of animal deaths due to the consumption of plastic from recent years. Not only land animals but it also affect marine life. Animals in the oceans and seas get stuck in these bags or like cows consume them leading to their death. Thus, we should protect the ecological balance by stopping the use of them.

In conclusion, I would like to say that we must prohibit the use of plastic to save animals and protect the environment from further damage.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 369, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...ears. Not only land animals but it also affect marine life. Animals in the oceans and ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78819444444 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52876726284 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7686979764 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228238571664 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836828266246 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075287364754 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149209234973 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114133975497 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.