Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree.
It is commonly argued that professional experts have been better treated by modern society in contrast to artists and musicians. I partly agree and partly disagree with this statement and in this essay I will provide statements that support my agreement and disagreement.
On one side, I agree that scientists and other experts valued more by the modern society because they work for the development of nation. Every year, their potential work is recognized by the government and the citizens. They are regularly awarded the noble prizes and president awards to carry on the good work. They are the pride of the nation, through their achievements, they make impossible things as easy as an apple pie. Moreover, every country spend decent percentage of its economy income for research work, which is also an act of encouragement to those researchers and scientists. Every Indian parent want their child to become a technology expert rather than a superstar. To some extent, such professionals are valued more than other workers.
The reasons why I disagree with the statement that technologist are more valued by musicians and artists is that the later have their own charm. They have become the ideal and role models of young generation. I am sure, none of the youth remember the great work of scientists but they remember each song of their favorite singer and musicians. These days, artists also receive several awards for their accomplishments. They have huge fan following around the globe. they are very much valued by their crazy fans.
In conclusion, every profession has its own values and achievements. I partially agree that scientists and technologists are more valued than artists and singers as they work for the betterment of nation and on the other side artists are the role model of the younger generation, which is decent percentage of world’s population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-10 | harmankaur | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | harmankaur | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | vinshu koul | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-14 | Farrugh | 84 | view |
| 2017-05-17 | Moushumi Shema | 96 | view |
- On recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter the manager of your insurance company. In your letter-Describe the item you lost-Explain how you lost it-Tell insurance com 78
- You arranged to visit a friend in England but an important event at home now means that you must change the dates of visit.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:-Explain the important-Apologize for the situation-Suggest a new arrangement 73
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 67
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial.To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development? 78
- Your recently bought a smartphone from a specailized store but it is not working properly you have called the shop several times but no action has been taken write an email to the shop manager in your letter give details of the mobile phone you purchased 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ve huge fan following around the globe. they are very much valued by their crazy fan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14006514658 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81078238539 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537459283388 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7020087862 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8235294118 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206300320101 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068805128149 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771773749992 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127492837592 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034052242354 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.