tpo 37
The reading passage discusses several criticisms about the turtle excluder device, which helps turtle escape from the net in which trapped. However, the lecturer finds the ideas dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First, the author argues that the number of turtles caught by each shrimper is rare, So it is not cost-effective for shrimpers to use TED device which helps not only turtles but also shrimps to run away from the net. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that since they are many boats in the coasts, the negative effect will sum to a high degree and will cause harm to the turtle population which is already rare and scarce.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that other methods can be used for saving these species, for example, limiting the time which shrimpers can keep their nets under water. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that since the number of shrimpers is high, it is not possible to monitor each of boats in the sea to identify whether they are following the time limit rule. It is more efficient for them to use TED and check each boat includes it at first.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that as some kinds of turtles have large bodies, the current TED device is not appropriate for helping them, and they will trap in the net. In contrast, the speaker dismisses the issue due to the fact that if in some areas this problem occurred, they can modify the TED size and use the larger one to prevent this problem.
- tpo 35 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government shouldspend more money on improving access to the Internet than on publictransportation. 71
- tpo 37integrated task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69402985075 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28158140824 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1354614083 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.777777778 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.