The given table compares two age groups in terms of their proportions of boys playing 5 distinct sports in the UK in 2010.
Overall, it is evident that football was the most popular discipline in both groups. In addition, boys in younger groups tended to be more active than the older counterparts, reflected by their higher percentages of participants in most sports.
Turning into detail, in comparison to the rates of footballer in 6-11 group, which reached 87%, the figure for 12-16 group was remarkably lower, with 78%. Likewise, basketball participants accounted for 35% of total boys aging from 6 to 11 years old, while they occupied exactly one fourth in the remaining category. Also, the percentage of boys taking part in cricket of 6-11-year-old group was significantly higher than that of 12-16 group, which were 45% and 34%, respectively.
Regarding to other sports, unlike the aforementioned disciplines, considerable differences were not witnessed. Indeed, in younger group, 23% of the entire population played rugby, which was slightly higher than a twenty-one-per-cent proportion in the older item. Meanwhile, swimming was the only sports observing equal rates of competitors in both groups, with 19%.
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers any more To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40104166667 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11609408037 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1424945589 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190630545827 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779536065547 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747265220558 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129439730659 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845556260231 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.