The main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers
The bar chart given below illustrate the main excuse for study among pupils of diverge age and total of espouse they accepted from employers. It can be seen that career was the biggest main reason for study among pupils in age under 26 and the highest support by employer to under 26
Regarding to the data, the top of main excuse for learning owned under 26 pupils reach 80 for career. Followed by 70 pupils from 26-29 and 58 pupils from 30-39 with same reason. Otherwise, in over 49 saw the biggest pupils reason for study cause interest with 70 and 19 others for career. Whereas in 40-49 from 80 pupils, owned amount similarity to choose reason study, each 40 cause for career and interest
In the another data, the biggest employer support in age under 26 with 63 employer. The second was age around 26-29 who supported by 50 employer. Succeed 45 employer espoused over 49 age group. Two others age group (30-39 and 40-49) only supported less from 40 employer. There was similarity between the highest total study in under 26 with the biggest support from employer. Likewise with pupils in 26-29 and two others group age students (30-39 and 40-49), although not as many as employer which supported student under 26. On the contrary, there was contrast foe over 49 age group which constitute two of top total student, only supported with a little employer, smaller than employer which supported 26-29 age group
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | kashyap sahil | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | Wisnu Legowo | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | 73 | view |
- The percentage of tourists to england who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 78
- C02 emissions for different forms of transport in thr european union 73
- Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 73
- In some contries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to reason'
Suggestion: to reason
...pils, owned amount similarity to choose reason study, each 40 cause for career and int...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'employer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'employers'.
Suggestion: employers
...mployer support in age under 26 with 63 employer. The second was age around 26-29 who su...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'employer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'employers'.
Suggestion: employers
...as age around 26-29 who supported by 50 employer. Succeed 45 employer espoused over 49 a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'employer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'employers'.
Suggestion: employers
...ho supported by 50 employer. Succeed 45 employer espoused over 49 age group. Two others ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'employer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'employers'.
Suggestion: employers
...9 and 40-49 only supported less from 40 employer. There was similarity between the highe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...with the biggest support from employer. Likewise with pupils in 26-29 and two others gro...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, regarding, second, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75609756098 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20973755204 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451219512195 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9976005934 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379636230891 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169077141074 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053116141234 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27362647858 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706283983918 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.