In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. For today's world, which system is appropriate?
Education is an essential to live quality life in this competitive world. It is a highly debated issue whether students should study many subjects or they should willingness to learn specific one to get degree of specialisation. Both systems have their own merits and demerits. Both trends will be elaborate in ensuing paragraph.
Discussing about general subject strategy, there are ample advantages of a basic domain knowledge of several subjects. The foremost one is that it can help children in acquiring broaden horizon. A broad range of subjects would provide a well rounded education which is very important for the holistic development of the students. Furthermore, children have not ability to select specific domain on that age. If they study all subjects, they can find out their real interest which help them to do work in proper manor in future. If they make wrong decision at that time then they may drop out of school or end up with low grades. Moreover, this strategy increase general knowledge of children which help students get skills to crake any time of competitive and international exams.
On the other hand, there are also many merits of studying a narrow range of subjects. Firstly, they can be specialist for particular domain and get job in special field from where they can earn astronomically high salary. Companies are also interested in candidate who have indeed deep knowledge of their domain. Additionally, these students enter the job market earlier and start earning. This helps them to support their family. What next, if students have knowledge of low range subjects can research and become researcher. For example, student who have good amount of knowledge of chemistry or physics, they can become scientist and find some unique concept which help society for development. Finally, students have lesser burden and spend more time for hobbies.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that students should prefer to do study until they can not find out their interest. Study of general subjects help to increase knowledge toward all direction. However, specific subject experts are highly demanded in market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Heng Sophat | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | rednivaralat | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | minoomrd | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
- It is said that Parents are the best teachers Do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as valuable work experience. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion. 84
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider, the rich more richer, the poor even more poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions? 67
- Young children should not be given electronic gadgets To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will be elaborate in ensuing paragraph. Discussing about general subject strateg...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 519, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ch help them to do work in proper manor in future. If they make wrong decision at that ti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... experts are highly demanded in market.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20461095101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67208676335 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559077809798 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5795000871 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0909090909 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7727272727 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168853574297 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508203605847 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495034981731 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987526480264 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483766556481 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.