Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a major controversial argue about what is more advanced whether construct new houses after the old house’s style or have unique area of many different kinds of houses. While some people believe that building the houses differently is better, I am strongly convinced that having a synchronization of housing style in the local areas certainly bring out many benefits.
There is a common belief that people should have their freedom to construct their dream home in their own ways. People may argue that building the houses after their visualization could make them feel like more belonging to that place. Because having the houses resemble to their imagination could satisfy their desire to create and decorate their own houses with their favorite subject and sense of visual art. Thus, the houses, undoubtedly, become the expression of their owner’s images. Moreover, some people believe that having divergent houses could make the local areas more vivid and unique.
However, I am firmly of the opinion that newly constructed apartments should look up to the old house’s style. The most important reason is that the synchronization of houses in the region could bring back a virtual beauty. It can easily be seen that, having similar houses makes the areas more urban and well-organized. Furthermore, the same housing areas are easier to manage and have urban planning. This means reducing the construction time and the designing cost of building new houses for the civilians and being more convenient for the government to take care of the construction work in those areas.
In conclusion, although the idea of having freedom to build houses follow their owners vision is beneficial in some ways, I am strongly convinced that we should having the newly built houses alike the old one. As a result, I recommend that the government should issue some policy about houses construction in the urban area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | NamVu | 84 | view |
- the picture illustrate the the working principals of a hot balloon 78
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summary the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units) 73
- Task 1: The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...use's style or have unique area of many different kinds of houses. While some people beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18849840256 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.718138312 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517571884984 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6903747113 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437675373547 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165139191767 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083151278401 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286966537405 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465395084004 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.