The percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The line graph gives information about amount of tourists to England who visited four differences attractions in Brighton along three decades from 1980 to 2010. There were four attractions will be figured out specifically art gallery, pavilion, pier, and festival which measured in percentage. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement amount of visitors had to be in pier clearly whilst the most declined attraction was in art gallery incrementally.
Regarding to the data, pier venue happened to be the most sharply increased trend which got 10% visited by tourists in 1980 and went up to two times higher in the last year of third decade approximately. Then it was followed by pavilion as the next progressed trend which the visitors counted from 24% in the early first decade and climbed up to 7% higher in 2010 thoroughly.
Differs with the former categories, reversely art gallery became the most declined among of visitors which started at 22% in 1980 and went down to 14% lower in the end of third decade. Same case with the former venue, the decrement amount of tourist had to be in festival which stood at 30% initially and slightly dropped down at 28% in 2010 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- One government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts event in the same years 67
- GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 73
- Global sales of games software, CDs, and DVD or Video 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- changes in annual spending by a particular UK in 1981, 1991, and 2001 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9068627451 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70024188331 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.1068573946 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201330429378 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102802321897 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14430444439 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130463683511 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117756974792 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.