The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The charts inform about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas between 1999 and 2004 in five European nations.
Both coffee and banana sales in the UK and Switzerland ranked at the top of the both charts during given periods as well as showing higher increase. Belgium, Denmark and Sweden had a no big change compared to England and Switzerland.
The United Kingdom had a dramatic increment from 1.5-20 million euros on coffee sales, a rise of 18.5 million euros in 5 years. And there was another huge rise of Switzerland on banana sales from 15-70 million euros in a same duration.
On the contrary, other nations which are recorded a slight movement on both coffee and banana sales. For example, while UK had raised from 1.5 to 20 million euros on coffee, Denmark illustrated from 2 to 1.8, a decrease of 0.2 million euros. It is clear that some countries showed skyrocketed sales on coffee and bananas but the others seemed plateau.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by peopleand that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue thathumans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses forfood and research. Discu 84
- Some people say that criminals should be sent to prison. Others insist that they should do something else as a punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Although you have never formally studied computing, you have always been interested in computers. You have just read about a computer course that really interests you, but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course. 73
- People can go to shops and banks and work with computers but some people worry that computers make people get more isolated and lose some social skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...of the both charts during given periods as well as showing higher increase. Belgium, Denma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, well, while, for example, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88271604938 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62827444359 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.7859640907 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251796730084 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129426978529 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188804363203 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213701258609 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.232164902266 0.0819641961636 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.