The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how can people reach out to a tourist bureau in a city through a half year in 2011.
At a glimpse of the chart, there are three kinds of methods that people had used those in 2011 and they are divided into 3 types: face to face, sending a letter or email and phoning.
In the beginning of 2011 on January, telephone communication was the highest preference that could make to the Tourist Information Office, but after 6 months, it ranked the second on among the choices. Surprisingly, the number of people who require the information in person increased from just under 500 to around 1900 in 2011, a rise of about 1400 during the period.
Curiously enough, either sending a letter or an email reduced no less than twice. Furthermore, April to May showed dramatically a decrease compared to by telephone because it seemed an increment about 2 times.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74675324675 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68002518598 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694805194805 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0109112811 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143152104952 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618323190143 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490137097621 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725666772099 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621850590527 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.