The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in fiveEuropean countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The fair-trade commerce of coffee and bananas among five European countries in 1999 compare to 2004 is illustrated on the table.
Overall, it is evident that the number of coffee selling in all countries witnessed an increase. However, there were three countries (switzerland, the United Kingdom, and belgium) witnessed a significant increase in banana selling, where the remaining countries saw a decrease last year.
In the initial years, the higher number of coffee selling was switzerland, accounted for 3 million, and then increased twofold in the following year. Denmark and the UK saw almost similar number at the beginning (1.5 and 1.8 millions), then the UK witnessed sharply increase (20 millions), while Denmark observed slightly rise at the end of the period. Regarding other nations, belgium and Sweden stood at 1 and 0.8 million each in the initial year and then saw a small growth in 2004.
Turning to bananas trading, in 1999, switzerland experienced the largest figure (15 million), after that raised to more than three times in the final year. following that, the UK figure was almost twice higher than belgium (1 and 0.6 million each), both nations experienced an increased more than five times in 2004. On the other hand, Sweden and Denmark experienced a decrease during the period. The selling stood at 1.8 and 2 million each in the 1999, and then fell to just about a half in 2004.
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 88
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- The graph and table below show the changes in the number of overseas visitors and top 5 visitor countries to Britain in 2004 and 2005. 73
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...ore than three times in the final year. following that, the UK figure was almost twice hi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00427350427 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59212958829 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9741801802 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848361354173 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041105057937 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365796467576 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647597874962 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353235772273 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.