Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Adventure tourism is evolving by leaps and bounds. In the current scenario, a large number of tourists are travelling to the locations where the situations are very difficult to live. Visiting these regions have both merits and drawbacks for the travellers and I shall discuss both in this essay.
To embark with the benefits, the primary advantage is that adventurous places improve confidence in one's abilities. In other words, people who visit such places always have the passion and they love to test their limits. For example, In India, hikers are trekking to most difficult places such as Churdhar peak, Triund, as this gives them a sense of satisfaction and brings the rush of adrenaline in them.
Another positive is that it helps in the economy. If the individuals start going to the untouched territories, the government will start noticing and for the convenience of tourists, they will build roads and hotels in such areas. This will give employment opportunities to the locals and thus boosts the economy.
On the other hand, there are some negatives to visiting hostile places. If things go against the plan, there can be serious issues such as accidents, which can cause serious damage and can leave a person immobile for life. For instance, the reports reveal that mountaineers going on mountain peaks such as Mount Everest, sometimes become paralysed, if they get stuck in them.
Furthermore, people going on these journeys can also face unknown consequences, which can affect both their families and the administration. To illustrate, during rafting, if there is any turbulence in the river, people might not able to handle themselves and get lost in the water and authorities have to launch costly rescue missions.
To conclude, although there are positives of visiting difficult places such as adventure and great experience, the disadvantages cannot be neglected and people have to be careful and well protected while travelling to these places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | Bharat11189 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | niravparmar | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | abcd1234 | 78 | view |
- In some countries people who visit art galleries are reducing What are the reasons for this How can this problem be solved 81
- In recent years , many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or negative development ? 73
- Some people say early education is important in a child s life while others say spending time with family is more vital To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own.Discuss both these views and give your 67
- You have a problem with a neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbor. i your letter. Describe the problem. say how long it has been a problem.. Explain what action you want the neighbors to take 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ps and bounds. In the current scenario, a large number of tourists are travelling to the location...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...dventurous places improve confidence in ones abilities. In other words, people who v...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21943573668 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75929743765 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573667711599 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.153874896 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229339256648 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654714166319 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605314912362 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108698083584 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729221772929 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.