Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
People have different views about protecting wild animals and birds is drawing too much concern and too many resources of society. While it is argued that it is of importance to allocate these resources to the human population, I completely agree that spending on protecting these kinds of wild animals can be sometimes more beneficial to human. The purpose of this essay is to analyze the controversy in more depth.
There are several reasons for saving wild animals and birds is that they are part of our ecosystem. One reason for this is that every species of wildlife plays a role to maintain the balance of life on Earth. For instance, there are many bat species that are becoming extinct. Such bats help keep the insect population in control. If these bats die then the insects will increase a lot and destroy our crops. So, we will have nothing to eat. Therefore, the loss of any species can affect us directly or indirectly.
One cannot deny that animal species have been vanishing at a much faster rate for recently. Especially when we consider that thousands of wild animals have been slaughtered or poached by some outlaws and some wild species are even facing the danger of extinction. The recent statistics show that over the past few years, the total population of this type of crane has shrunk to one-fifth of its original population, which means this crane is almost on the verge of extinction. It is understandable that it seems to me that other than spending too much fund or giving too much attention, our governments, as well as individuals, have not done enough to protect the wild lives.
In conclusion, I strongly agree the resources spent on these animals and plants, are well justified. Wildlife is Mother Nature’s greatest treasure. To protect it, we must take every measure.
- The percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited different attractions 11
- The table below shows the employment of students from four countries in the UK after their first courses in 2001 85
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph shows data for annual sales revenue or turnover for three outdoor clothing companies from 2004 and 2014. 73
- the are the advantages and disadvantages of taking English lessons with classmates form the same country 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 5.60731707317 624% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8640776699 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65119462913 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 106.607317073 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 283.868780488 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7447551506 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4117647059 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272304059671 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072423058234 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894770931753 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161271061892 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976309082575 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.