the are the advantages and disadvantages of taking English lessons with classmates form the same country?
These days, learning English has become an important and widely debated issue. It is often claimed that taking English courses with classmates has negative effects. I believe that it would bring certain benefits as well as some drawbacks
The first advantage of acquiring skill with friends is the ability of understanding knowledge. The rate of school groups created from friends increases significantly to improve each other in their study. Another reason is that acquiring knowledge of a new language with classmates is a good way to impulse the development of learning. The result of classmates becomes one of the motivations that the learner has to effort.
Despite this, there is the myriad weakness of this suggestion is that the pronunciation. The friend mates cannot pronounce as well as the foreigner. This is difficult to realize how to pronounce standard. Consequently, the beginner cannot adjust the mistakes timely when they absorb an awareness. In addition to this, the reflex ability in communication has a negative impact. Most students commonly use their own language to exchange lessons with each other, this becomes harder for improving during the studied process for new languages.
To sum up, although some evidence to support the claim that joining an English course with friends come to the same country has a good point effect. I am inclined to believe that participating with classmates bring a downside because students cannot correct the pronounced mistakes. Moreover, if the students can not change this, I believe it is difficult to improve their English language.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the number of students from four different countries enrolled at Avago Language School in Sydney.Between 1990 and 2000 the composition of the student body changed and the Asian economic crisis seriously affected the overall number of 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010. 73
- The graph shows data for annual sales revenue or turnover for three outdoor clothing companies from 2004 and 2014. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, well, as to, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32283464567 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82410551346 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6153466287 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221762531524 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636754393548 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737234627599 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132771651966 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599923625218 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.