the pie charts below show the avarage household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
two pie charts show ratio average expenditures on six by major category in 1950 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage average hosehold expenditures was housing while the most negative was health care.
In the one other hand in 1950, the housing got 72,1% which the highest category, followed by food which was 11,2% then percentage education noted 6,6% the other marked 4,4%. Meanwhile pencentage was number two fell down transportation at 3,3% and remain percentage health care (2,4%). The higher housing counted 72,1% and beside one of the smallest health care with 2,4%.
On the other hand in 2010, these explained major category avarege household expenditures, very fluctustuate, a dramatic reduce significantly housing 50%. The next education which was 0,3%. In contrast, food increased steadily the amount of 22,8%. Subsequently other noted 14,8%. In addition to transportation grew 10,7%. Nethermost health care dropped dramatically 2,1%.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 73
- the two pie chart show changes in world population by region between 1990 and 2000 91
- the graph below gives information about internet user in three countries between 1999 and 2009. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 41
- the graph below shohs the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in european country between 1979 and 2004. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
two pie charts show ratio average expenditu...
^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ation noted 6,6% the other marked 4,4%. Meanwhile pencentage was number two fell down tra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...increased steadily the amount of 22,8%. Subsequently other noted 14,8%. In addition to trans...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49333333333 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84365961395 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646666666667 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4931922046 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9090909091 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6363636364 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13431301537 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487718901438 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108107150615 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104672686605 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976592829566 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.