the two pie chart show changes in world population by region between 1990 and 2000
The two pie charts illustrate changes in world population between 1900 and 2000. The major regions are represented as persentages of the world population. Overall, this representatif gigantic increase in the number of humans on the planet from 1.600 million to 6 billon in just one hendred years. In general this population growth has occurred in developing countries.
From 1900 to 2000 Africa’s percentage of world population increased from 4,5% to 10% while Latin america grew from 3% to 8% of world population. On the other hand, the percentage of population in Europe and Asia decreased during the same period. Eroupe dropped from 25% to 14% while Asia’s percentage dismiss from 60% to 54%. north america, however, showed stagnant or stabil, remaining at 5% of world population both in 1900 to 2000. The middle East and north Africa, a new category in 2000, represented 6% of world population. The percentage of population in the remaining areas of the world other rose slighty from 2,5% to 3%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
- the two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sector in Canada in 2005 and 2010 78
- in some countries, young people are encourage to work or travel foe a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 61
- the two pie chart show changes in world population by region between 1990 and 2000 91
- the graph below shohs the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in european country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as occurred in developing countries. From 1900 to 2000 Africa's percenta...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: North
...s;s percentage dismiss from 60% to 54%. north america, however, showed stagnant or s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... north america, however, showed stagnant or stabil, remaining at 5% of world popu...
^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le East and north Africa, a new category in 2000, represented 6% of world populat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1265060241 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88116225681 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.347386453 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32489852331 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143431097798 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170183293921 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267445237463 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872613802274 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.