The line graph illustrates the average cost of cell phone services and residential phone services in the USA, from 2001-2010.
An overall view shows that the average costs of cell phone services experienced an upward trend, while the residential phone services experienced a downward trend. However, in 2006 both services cost $550.
In the first stage, in 2001, the amount of money spent by Americans on residential phone services was around $700, while the cell phone services were accounted at $200. It is noticed that within one year only, the cell phone services cost increased almost by $100 and on the other hand the residential phone services decreased by the same amount.
Reaching 2006, the meeting point, there was a significant rise in the cost of the cell phone services until it reached almost $750. As for the residential services, it showed a remarkable fall, after 2006, reaching almost $400 in 2010.
- The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010. 61
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment. What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it? 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rel 81
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate. 78
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your ans 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the average c...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e services in the USA, from 2001-2010. An overall view shows that the average c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03289473684 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58852109939 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532894736842 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7362223204 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4076559465 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217619679229 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129533904625 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294951675636 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114540140069 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.