Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums are the keepsake of historical, scientific, artistic, or cultural artifacts which are stored and exhibited. Various museums have their own norms and systems. Some museums charge for the admission while the rest are free. This essay will shed the lights on both the aspect of museum with my personal concrete stance.
The charges at the entrance in the museums have a wide range of advantages. The funds collected for the admission is used up for the maintenance of the museum itself. The funds helps to realize the importance of responsibility to every guests in safeguarding the objects with a greater value. For instance, the funds collected can either used for infrastructural development or garden management. These structures will further enhance the facilities and services to the visitors.
Secondly, it is the responsibility of every citizen to protect their ancient objects or values. A small support by every individual leads to the greater impact overall for the management of the institution. For example, a local community in Sindhupalchok, Nepal have made a compulsory mandate for operation and management fund collection conserving a historical palace with the aim to develop the site as a tourist hub. A win-win local initiative as such is now the major source of income to the local community through tourism in addition to the restoration of cultural values and promotion of social integrity.
On the other hand, the charging of the fees may demotivate individuals towards the institution. People still think that it is the responsibility of government to preserve and manage the government institutions. On contrary, free access could help researcher, academician and other associated personnel to accomplish their studies with exploration of knowledge to the greater depth which can be beneficial to both the parties.
To sum up, it is a responsibility of the government to fund and manage the institutions with nations pride, however, a minimum of the entrance fees might help in realizing its importance and contribute to social integrity. I personally feel that, the advantages of charging for entrance in museum far outweighs the disadvantages.
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think that new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss an 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 67
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevan 73
- The graph below gives the information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r the maintenance of the museum itself. The funds helps to realize the importance o...
^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'help'.
Suggestion: help
...tenance of the museum itself. The funds helps to realize the importance of responsibi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36918604651 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16157076122 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7781652346 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.611111111 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325434397691 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10936248294 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135074324541 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175181024701 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837308692391 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.