The Pie Charts illustrate the typical expenses made by household on six different category in a county in two different years, 1950 and 2010.
Overall, money spent on housing was highest in 1950, which was surpassed by food in 2010. Furthermore, while the spending on food, healthcare, transportation and other increased, expenditure on housing decreased in 2010.
In 1950, about three fourth of average expenditure (72%) was made on housing, which was the highest among all. Food accounting for 11.2 percent of the money spent stood second in the list. Less than 7% of expenses were made on remaining categories.
By 2010, food contributed to approximately one third of total expenditure at 34% by witnessing a significant rise of three times over 60 years. Similarly, a five fold, a four fold and a two fold rise were experienced by other, transportation and healthcare resulting in 19.2%, 14% and 4.5% respectively. On the other hand, proportion of expenses on housing declined dramatically by almost 50% to rest at 22 %. Change in the money spent on education was unremarkable as it stood at 6.6 % in 1950 and 6.3% in 2010.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 11
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 56
- The charts below shows the percentage is of students joining north west University 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...nses made by household on six different category in a county in two different years, 195...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, similarly, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02659574468 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05000340584 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0966775575 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204247816152 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755367257328 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731725611298 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133275844805 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608870299931 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.