Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming?
<div><span style="font-size: 15px; white-space: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, Roboto, "Segoe UI", "Segoe WP", "Helvetica Neue", "Lucida Grande", Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif;">There is a controversial issue about who should deal with the problem of climate change. Some ecologists think that global society should take a responsibility for this, while some politicians disagree with them and suggest that every country should solve it alone. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agrees with the idea of international involvement.</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 15px; white-space: normal;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 15px; white-space: normal;">Let us start with the reasons why some ecologists argue that global organizations should tackle global warming. </span>The first reason is that joint efforts bring more results. It is hardly possible for developing countries on their own to deal with climate change, because unlike developed states, they can neither afford expensive technologies nor hire well-known ecologists, but with the financial help from global organizations, they can purchase equipment as well as employ experts. </div><div>Another motive is a low chance of funding misuse. Many countries are recieving the help from developed countries to solve this problem, but they have not achieved any noticeable goals, mostly because some corrupted politicians use most of the money for their own advantage. </div><div><br></div><div>However, some politicians state that international societies should not address the problem with climate change. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, they may be unaware of regional specifics. Many international societies find it arduous to deal with climate alteration in some regions, since they have either their own geographic features or ways of economic development. For example, Kazakstan heavily depends on production of both oil and gas, which cannot be easily replaced by other industries. Secondly, the bureaucracy in international organizations often poses obstacles rather than a solution. Many joint ventures, which are founded to reduce global warming, often work ineffectivelly owing to their complexity in organization, so it often happens that local organizations work faster and more productively as long as they obtain monetary assistance abroad. <br></div><div><br></div><div>In conclusion, even though some politicians say that each country has to solve the problem with climate alteration itself, I think that international organizations can solve this problem more effectively for the above mentioned arguments. </div><div></div>
- Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people says trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns, while other says housing facilities should be built instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- It is inevitable that as technology advances traditional cultures will be lost It seems that we cannot have these two things together To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 78
- Some believe that it is good for a country's culture to import films and TV programmes, while others think that it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The television is good for you.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of watching television.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 7.14084507042 5.12529762239 139% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 6.02037801127 2.80592935109 215% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625352112676 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 168.110402528 49.4020404114 340% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 230.454545455 106.682146367 216% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 32.2727272727 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932219999304 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396148894492 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380475099207 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932219999304 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.3 13.0946893788 216% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 5.16 50.2224549098 10% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 11.3001002004 181% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 24.72 12.4159519038 199% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 9.78957915832 235% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 25.0 10.7795591182 232% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.