Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?
Technology is improving the way of communication and many organizations wants to take the benefit of this advancement to bridge the gaps of connectivity between employees. It is believed by some managers that they should be able to contact their staff every moment they want to. In my opinion this development has more benefits as compared with drawbacks.
On the positive side, availability of employees all time can directly benefits the organization in terms of outcome. The communication between employees will be strong to put better results as a team. Employees can clear their doubt at any time without delaying and their problems can be solved which will directly improve the output of organization. For instance, online WhatsApp group between company teams is very common these days to discuss the concern regarding shop floor activities and questions. Therefore, these benefits are to drive a unity in team and improved the outcome of all employees which directly benefits the organization.
On the negative side, personal life of an employee is affected as employee has to dedicate more time to his job. Contacting employees all the time can hinder their private life and other activities. This sometimes results into stressful life and frustration with the company. In majority of the cases employees prefer to shift their jobs because of inability of handle pressure of presence all the time. A survey revealed that the persuading employees to be present all time for organization has adverse impacts on their family life balance.
In conclusion, despite of negative impacts on the family and social culture, I believe that contacting employees all the time has more advantages for the organization as well as for employee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-08 | pooyanfaizian | 61 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent do you agree? 61
- A restaurant has placed an advertisement for waiters and waitresses in your local newspaper.Write a letter to the restaurant, applying for the job. In your letter:•explain what you are currently doing•describe your suitability for this area of work• 73
- Your school has enough money to purchase either computer for students or books for the library. Which should your school choose to buy – computers or books? Use specific reasons and examples to support your recommendation. 73
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others believe individuals can also do some things to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e organization as well as for employee.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26523297491 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9016722247 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544802867384 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7045841823 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19963198135 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074815593933 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563833469326 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132971116031 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633578432004 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.