The chart represents data on the changes in money spent on eating in the number of 6 categories in three years (1992, 2002 and 2012) in Italy.
Generally, it can be seen that there were upward trends in the amount spent on beef, chicken, potatoes, milk whereas coffee witnessed a downward trend.
It is clear that the expenditure on chicken and potatoes were a steep increase over a decade, it rose 18 and 7 million euros, respectively. To specify, although the amount spent on beef reached a nadir at 41 millions of euros in 2002, the trend was upward. Like the amount spent on beef, the number of money spending on milk had a dip fall in 2002 and immediately rise by 6 millions of euros, at 14 millions of euros in 2012.
On the other hand, only the figure for coffee decreased 2 millions of euros from 1992 to 2002, it stabilized at 7 millions of euros for the next 4 years. Meanwhile, the money spending for butter/margarine remained stable at 8 millions of euros although it had a marginal increase in 2002.
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 89
- The line graph compares birth rates in China and the US and how these rates changed from 1920 to 2000 73
- In Many parts of the world today, there is a profitable market for products which lightens the skin.Outline the reasons for using such products and discuss the effect they have in terms of health and society. 67
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge Wri 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '41 million'.
Suggestion: 41 million
...amount spent on beef reached a nadir at 41 millions of euros in 2002, the trend was upward. Li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...ip fall in 2002 and immediately rise by 6 millions of euros, at 14 millions of euros in 2012....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '14 million'.
Suggestion: 14 million
...diately rise by 6 millions of euros, at 14 millions of euros in 2012. On the other hand, only...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...d, only the figure for coffee decreased 2 millions of euros from 1992 to 2002, it stabilized ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 million'.
Suggestion: 7 million
...ros from 1992 to 2002, it stabilized at 7 millions of euros for the next 4 years. Meanwhile, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...for butter/margarine remained stable at 8 millions of euros although it had a marginal increa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52173913043 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65181750991 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.2315462117 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638378520687 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349676350092 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264389506617 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0358511695758 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255004265555 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.