Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree?
There are varied schools of thought on the type of literature is of greater benefit to teach pupils – either their local literary works or the foreign ones. A group proposed that teaching local literature is of advantage. This essay of mine will endeavor to discuss these issues, while each side of the debate has her reasons, I disagree however!
Literature is a very vital tool which helps the developing mind appreciate his/her awareness, history, culture and traditions. It tends to preserve the way of life of the group of persons that propounded such pieces of art. It aids to pass on the relevant information required for the culture to thrive and a template to reflect on. When children study their indigenous artistic outputs, it tends to reinforce their identity, understand where they came from, where they are and where they could be heading.
On the contrary, not teaching wards the literature of other countries, tends to restrict their outlook to life! It renders them parochial, self-centred and intolerant of others, on account of these they will not be able to integrate and relate well with others. They will be prone to seeing their way of life as the only way, whereas, there are many ways to skin a rabbit! Furthermore, in the view of our rapidly changing world, where barriers and borders are crumbling daily, will it be safe to say that literature and other forms of art are local or peculiar to a group? Belief systems evolve daily, resistance to alien ideas will also limit the physical, social and emotional development of such juveniles and this will cause them to be irrelevant in the scheme of things developing around them. A case in point is the issue of homophobia, sexism and human rights.
In closing, I will disagree with the side proposing, that, “it is more important to teach children literature of their own country than other countries” because cultural integration is the capital for human development in this modern era and anyone not cashing in, will be left behind!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | Agbaoje | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Phuong Uyen | view | |
| 2019-03-15 | huuhung7301 | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-02 | Raman kanda | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | Dthphuong | 73 | view |
- Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 11
- To learn effectively, children need to eat a healthy meal at school.How true is this statement? Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children? 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 73
- Some of people prefer to spend their lifes doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 11
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisationWhy might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 264, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cashes'.
Suggestion: cashes
...pment in this modern era and anyone not cashing in, will be left behind!
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94152046784 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6507230879 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.7949040664 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.636363636 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0909090909 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201447230472 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070069147467 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798511817046 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135934521162 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869603586773 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.