Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I am absolutely agreed. The world dose not make sense any more; It is better to call the global village. Thanks to the Internet, people can contact eachother by far distances. There are several reason to support my oppnion as follwings:
First of all, scientists, the developer of civilization and technology, are in touch with internet. They can share their discoveries and read the papers of their coleagues. This has led to broaden herizons of scientists and have made it possible to put the knowledge out of the list which is called exclusive assets list of the governments. Is the result of such capabelities anything except serving humanity and even improving transportaion facilities?
The second one is the developing interdiciplinary subjects. The barriers of different sciences is being been pale. The internet supplys infinite sources for researchers to learn more and more. One can study about programming skills and learn a codding language and take advantages of it in structural engineering, as I am doing it, just by attending online courses. As it can be inferred, the internet makes lots of forums that specialists can chat and solving their problem.
The importance of the speed of transfering data can be the third crucial benefit. Today, people are the sick of speed and they are not to stand any time wasting. The role of internet in improving communication speed is indispensebale. For instance, A letter from the northen hemisphere to the southern hemisphere is sent just by a click, the thing that is called email. People are getting used to making all of comunications and even memos electronic and vanishing the paperworks. So the internet is serveing environment directly by preventing trees to be cut, by reducing the amount of harmful released gases from the paper and pen factories.
All in all, I think improving public transportation would be happen as a consequance of improving the internet; Beacuse the internet leads to groundbreaking progresses in engineering and this is generelized to the public transportation facilities. So investing on the internet industry not only is not a capital wasting, but also is a realible way to earn more money. If one is to serve next generaton, should pay enough attention to the internet.
- Experience is the best teacher 86
- Are parents the best teachers? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...t eachother by far distances. There are several reason to support my oppnion as follwings: Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... different sciences is being been pale. The internet supplys infinite sources for r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, third, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11051212938 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.104672025 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579514824798 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.772579955 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175754142225 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441166960426 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478596302832 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090990875547 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393982525055 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.