Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is argued by some individuals that authority should consume invest in faster public transport. Others do not agree and believe that capital should be utilized on different hurdles of public transport like cost reduction and securing the environment. This essay will discuss both aspects followed by personal opinion.
To begin with, improvement in speed transport is essential to curtail the travel time from one location to another. Faster public transport like metro trains can allow individuals to travel long distances in short durations without getting stuck in traffic congestions. Therefore it is valid and useful for the government to spend money on such projects. For that reason, various crowded and developing nations are looking to acquire faster public transport means like high-speed rail projects, such as, in India, the government is spending a huge amount in metro projects across the nation since their first successful development of Delhi metro project.
However, other aspects are equally pivotal for any nation to curb pollution and other environmental problems, thus the government should seek the identification of different problems emerging in the public transportation system. For instance, the smog problems due to fuel cars in India is currently at saturation level, therefore, the alternative to these vehicles like electric transportation is getting introduced these days on Indian roadways. Hence, each year the authorities are increasing the budget for electric cars to promote more use of these vehicles.
In my opinion, I believe that for the sake of advancement and development of a nation, the government should spend more money on faster public transport.
In conclusion, although, the repair in current transport is vital to maintain the environment, I consider the faster transportation is way more beneficial for the nation growth, hence, the state must utilize more money in such projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-09 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | bhatvishal@ | 84 | view |
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- You recently took a part-time job working for a local company. After a few weeks, you realized there were some problems with the job.Write a letter to the manager of the company. In your letter explain why you took the job. describe the problems that yo 73
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree? 61
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...y will discuss both aspects followed by personal opinion. To begin with, improvement in speed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t getting stuck in traffic congestions. Therefore it is valid and useful for the governme...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54026845638 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92201731974 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3915910198 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.583333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348234231733 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138771374149 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104098772778 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218335308326 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102885721152 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.